Privacy & New Media

EPIC

Nov. 5, 2020

California voters this week approved Proposition 24, the California Privacy Rights Act, with 56% of voters supporting the measure. EPIC previously published an analysis of Proposition 24, nothing that the measure “would make some important improvements to privacy protections for California residents, particularly through the establishment of a California Privacy Protection Agency.” In 2018, the State of California enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”), the first comprehensive consumer privacy law enacted in the United States. Proposition 24 significantly changes the CCPA. EPIC has also published a resource to help California residents exercise their rights under the CCPA.

The content in this post was found at:
<https://epic.org/2020/11/california-voters-pass-califor.html>

Clicking the title or link will take you to the source of the post and was not authored by the moderators of privacynnewmedia.com.

EPIC

Nov. 9, 2020

 

The FTC has reached a settlement with Zoom requiring the company to address data security but fails to address user privacy. Writing in dissent, Commissioner Slaughter said, “When companies offer services with serious security and privacy implications for their users, the Commission must make sure that its orders address not only security but also privacy.” Commissioner Chopra, also dissenting, wrote “The FTC’s status quo approach to privacy, security, and other data protection law violations is ineffective.” In July 2019, EPIC sent a detailed complaint to the FTC citing the flaws with Zoom and warning that the company had “exposed users to the risk of remote surveillance, unwanted video calls, and denial-of-service attack.” In April 2020, EPIC wrote to Chairman Simons urging the FTC to open an investigation. EPIC has long advocated for the creation of a U.S. data protection agency.

EPIC

Nov. 10, 2020

A divided federal appeals court has ruled that Baltimore’s use of spy planes to continuously surveil the city does not violate the Fourth Amendment. The technology, known as wide-area aerial surveillance, allows police to capture high-definition video and track the movements of pedestrians and vehicles over a 32-square mile area. Although the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals acknowledged “that there are aerial surveillance programs that would transgress basic Fourth Amendment protections,” the court concluded that Baltimore’s program “does not violate the Constitution” and “burdens privacy substantially less than a well-established staple of existing surveillance: security cameras.” Chief Judge Roger L. Gregory dissented, concluding that the Supreme Court’s decision in Carpenter v. United States requiring a warrant for cell phone location data also requires police to obtain a warrant for persistent aerial surveillance. Gregory explained that “Long-term, recorded surveillance of public movements uncovers more than temporary trailing by a suspecting officer; it reveals a person’s most intimate associations and activities.” EPIC filed an amicus brief in Carpenter v. United States and has long fought to limit drone surveillance and other forms of aerial spying.

The content in this post was found at:
<https://epic.org/2020/11/divided-court-rules-baltimores.html>

Clicking the title or link will take you to the source of the post and was not authored by the moderators of privacynnewmedia.com.

EPIC

Nov. 10, 2020

EPIC and a coalition of privacy, civil rights, and consumer organizations have released a policy framework for the Biden Administration to protect privacy and digital rights for all Americans. “Without laws that limit how companies can collect, use, and share personal data, we end up with an information and power asymmetry that harms consumers and society at large,” the groups said. “Individual, group and societal interests are diminished, and our privacy and other basic rights and freedoms are at risk.” The ten recommendations include: 1) recognizing privacy and surveillance as racial justice issues; 2) establishing algorithmic governance and accountability to advance fair and just data practices; 3) encourage enactment of a baseline comprehensive federal privacy law; 4) the establishment of a U.S. Data Protection Agency; and 5) bringing consumer, privacy, and civil rights experts into key government positions.

The content in this post was found at:
<https://epic.org/2020/11/epic-coalition-release-data-pr.html>

Clicking the title or link will take you to the source of the post and was not authored by the moderators of privacynnewmedia.com.

Nov. 10, 2020

EPIC submitted comments urging the Department of Homeland Security’s Data Privacy and Integrity Advisory Committee to investigate fusion centers and recommend that DHS ban facial recognition technology at fusion centers.

The content in this post was found at:

<https://epic.org/2020/11/epic-again-urges-dhs-advisory-.html>

Clicking the title or link will take you to the source of the post and was not authored by the moderators of privacynnewmedia.com.