Illinois Appellate Court Reinstates Biometric Privacy Action, Finding Potential Harm in Alleged Disclosure of Fingerprint to Outside Vendor

4 01 2020

Proskauer–New Media and Technology Law Blog
Jeffrey Neuburger on October 16, 2018
Late last month, an Illinois appellate court reversed a lower court’s dismissal of biometric privacy claims against a tanning salon franchisee that had collected the plaintiff’s fingerprint to allow entry in its own salon and any L.A. Tan salon location nationwide.  (Sekura v. Krishna Schaumburg Tan, Inc., 2018 IL App (1st) 180175 (Ill. App. Sept. 28, 2018)).  The plaintiff alleged that the tanning salon violated the Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), which regulates the collection, retention, and disclosure of personal biometric identifiers and biometric information, by collecting her fingerprints without obtaining the required written release and providing the required disclosure concerning its retention policy, and further by disclosing her fingerprints to a third-party vendor. [Note: In 2016, in a separate suit, the same plaintiff settled BIPA claims with L.A. Tan Enterprises, Inc., operator (directly and through franchisees) of L.A. Tan tanning salons].
more
The content in this post was found at:
https://newmedialaw.proskauer.com/2018/10/16/illinois-appellate-court-reinstates-biometric-privacy-action-finding-potential-harm-in-alleged-disclosure-of-fingerprint-to-outside-vendor/

Clicking the title or link will take you to the source of the post. and was not authored by the moderators of privacynnewmedia.com.

Powered by WPeMatico


Actions

Informations